top of page
Search

Explosion of Chronic Disease in Our Children

The above graphic is a modified version of a additional rates of chronic disease increased researched and added by HFI 2018.


Over the past fifty years, rates of autoimmunity and chronic disease in our children have exploded: currently 1 in 2.5 American children has a severe allergy, 1 in 11 has asthma, 1 in 36 has autism and the list goes on. While some attribute this rise to increased awareness and diagnosis, Thomas Cowan, MD, argues for a direct causal relationship to a corresponding increase in the number of vaccines American children typically receive―approximately 72 vaccine doses by age eighteen. The goal of these vaccines is precisely what we’re now seeing in such abundance among our chronically ill children: the provocation of immune response.


With our 72 doses of toxic injections, have we have traded acute (short-term self-limiting) illness for life-long chronic disease?


Dr. Cowan looks at emerging evidence that certain childhood illnesses are actually protective of disease later in life; examines the role of fever, the gut, and cellular fluid in immune health; argues that vaccination is an ineffective (and harmful) attempt to shortcut a complex immune response; and asserts that the medical establishment has engaged in an authoritarian argument that robs parents of informed consent. His ultimate question, from the point of view of a doctor who has decades of experience treating countless children is: What are we really doing to children when we vaccinate them?


Proven Cause and Correlation?

The rate of chronic diseases in our children is astounding and outright terrifying for those paying attention.

The past 8 to 10 years:

  • Juvenile Diabetes increased by 23%

  • Cancer increased by 29%

  • ADHD increased by 43%

  • Food Allergies increased by 50%

  • Asthma rates rose by almost 50%

  • Autism increased 150%

Is there a “cause and correlation” effect relative to children’s chronic health issues surrounding the overwhelmingly accelerating negative health demographics seemingly related following the inordinate mandated number of multi-valent vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as administered by pediatricians since the 1990s?


Dr Cowan brings up very valid points that direct us to a solid conclusion that vaccines, by their very nature, are triggering the chronic illnesses in our children. Epidemiological studies (statistical surveys) show poorer long-term health is more common among the vaccinated who survive without serious injury than children who are not vaccinated. (3, 4, 8, 9)


However this is a question apparently no one in federal health agencies, specifically the CDC and FDA, wants neither to investigate nor find statistically valid data and answers either to substantiate or disprove using science-based methods. They are quick to dismiss any suggestion of a link.


The science is settled – is the resounding rebuttal.


What is informed consent?

Informed consent would be a parent saying, “Yes I know that giving my child a chickenpox vaccine will shift them more towards allergies, autoimmune disease and even cancer. I know it will create some neurotoxicity, but I’m not willing to live with the chance of them getting chickenpox.” That is a truly informed parents making the choice they believe best for their child.


The alternative to informed consent is what is heard most often “Do the vaccine, they work great, there’s no downside.” This is a fairytale.


It is critical that parents research the information that is readily available to them. Reading vaccine ingredients, the vaccine inserts about the risks, reactions and the lack of studies performed for the vaccines the doctors are recommended they inject their children.


Looking for more information on vaccines and their risk? Visit LearntheRisk.org: NVIC.org and Vaccine.guide


Remember when science is “settled” – it is no longer science…it is simply blind faith.


And what of the onslaught of toxins that our children are bombarded with daily?

  • Toxic Consumption 75% of our foods contains residue of carcinogenic, endocrine disputing chemicals

  • Toxic Absorption Personal care products are loaded with untested chemicals and absorbed by the skin. OTC drugs and cosmetics: Different formulations are able to improve or reduce permeation, penetration and absorption of each molecule, but every molecule has a specific capacity of skin permeation, penetration and absorption in function of specific chemical-physical factors. It is a nonsense the tentative to demonstrate that if it is a cosmetic , cannot penetrate. There is not a traffic light that allows substances to pass through or not, according to what is written on the product label. -Rodolfo Baraldini SOURCES of statistics from FocusforHealth.org with additional links provided by HFI for updated statistics

*2001 through 2009 asthma rates rose the most among black children, almost a 50% increase.

4.https://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_death_age_group_2016_1056w814h.gif

8. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/facts.html

Zack MM, Kobau R. National and state estimates of the numbers of adults and children with active epilepsy – United States, 2015. MMWR. 2017. 66(31);821-825. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/mm6631a1.htm?s_cid=mm6631a1_w.

Toxins Statistics: Learn more from EWG consumer guides: https://www.ewg.org/consumer-guides

d. Personal Care Products: https://www.ewg.org/skindeep/

e. learntherisk.org, nvic.org

 

PLEASE NOTE:

The content, ideas, and views in this article are those of the presenter(s); Arvesa does not claim ownership of the content or the information provided above. Arvesa’s intention in sharing information is to provide access to said information so that viewers may come to their own informed conclusion(s).

FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER:

Copyright Disclaimed under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use, including that of educational or personal use, is a use as permitted by copyright statute. Arvesa has uploaded this information as to preserve its integrity for educational purposes. Therefore, the use of material in this post constitutes a ‘FAIR USE’ of any such copyrighted material; the martial in this article is for research and educational purposes only.

Kommentare

bottom of page